VirtualPro

I’ve recently been evaluating some of the new features in VMware vSphere to see what use they would be to my current employer. One of the areas that I touched upon in my “what’s new in vSphere Storage”  blog post was thin provisioning.  I wanted to come back and cover this particular topic in more detail as it’s a key feature and it’s available throughout all versions of vSphere so I’m sure everyone will be interested in it.

What is Thin Provisioning?

Thin Provisioning in it’s simplest form is only using the disk space you need.  Traditionally with virtual machines if you create a 500GB virtual disk it will use 500GB of your VMFS datastore. With Thin Provisioning you can create a 500GB virtual disk, but if only 100GB is in use only 100GB of your VMFS datastore will be utilised. Credit to Chad Sakac for the diagrams below.

How does it work in vSphere?

Thin Provisioning is being heralded as something new with vSphere,  when in truth it was already available in VI3.  In VI3 creating a thin provisioned disk involved using vmkfstools and was also not a production supported VM configuration.  Now in vSphere the creation of thin provisioned disks can be carried out from the VI Client (see below) and is a supported production configuration for a VM.

It’s as simple as checking a check box, the results are pretty good to.  Below you can see I have created two thin provisioned VM’s on my new ESX4i host and you can see the provisioned space and the used space stats being shown in the VI Client. 

What are the benefits?

The thin provisioning  feature is perfect for my home lab environment where disk space is at a premium, but how does it translate into real world implementations of ESX.  Well I for one have been looking at exactly this to identify what benefits could be achieved within my employers ESX estate. A quick audit found that our development and system test ESX environment was running at 48% disk utilisation,  so straight away thin provisioning would save us 52% on storage capacity used. Paul Manning of VMware mentioned on a recent communities podcast that on average vSphere would save users 50% on storage.   This is possibly not such a big thing when your talking about test environments, but when you move up to production SAN Storage, saving 50% on an expensive SAN array is a very real and tangabile cost saving.  One that people should definately take into account when making a cost benefit case for buying or upgrading to vSphere.

What are the potential downsides?

One of my personal concerns with thin provisioning is the potential overhead on any write activity that would requires the extension of the VMDK file.  To me there is an obvious VMFS operation that needs to take place there which would add to the overall time to complete the disk write.  When there is a requirement to expand a disk, the VMDK files will increase in increments based on the block size of the underlying VMFS partition, 1MB, 2MB, 4MB or 8MB.  So the overhead may be smaller if your VMFS has been formatted with a bigger block size, i.e. for a 16MB write it only has to expand 2 blocks when the VMFS block size is 8MB but would have to expand 16 blocks if it was formatted with the 1MB block size.  I can imagine this percieved overhead could put people off using thin provisioned disks for certain production based environments, especially those where there is a lot of write I/O activity,  SQL Server or Exchange for example.  To counteract that though,  the improvements in the VMware I/O Stack should compensate for this performance overhead.  This could potentially leave you in a situation where you’ve reduced a VM’s storage footprint and still have performance equal to that experienced in VI3,  possibly not a bad trade off.  I’d also expect people running their VMware environment on enterprise SAN technologies from the likes of EMC or NetApp to notice minimal performance impact with thin provisioning as SAN memory caches help take up the strain.

Another downside is if you want to use VMware Fault Tolerance to protect a VM then you cannot use thin provisioned disks.  To be honest this is a small issue as Fault Tolerance protection is most likely going to be on virtual machines that are important to your organisation.  These machines are probably the ones you wouldn’t thin provision in the first place for performance reasons.

Thin provisioning creates it’s own unique problem in that what we’re basically doing here is over provisioning the storage.  You need to keep a very close eye on thin provisioning as it’s quite feasabile that your VMFS datastore could fill up and your virtual machines fall over.  Not what you want to come into on a Monday morning,  or any morning for that matter.  So you need to monitor your storage and ensure that there is enough free space.  One of the simplest ways to do this is through the use of the new alarms in vSphere that allow you to alert on datastore usage and datastore over provisioning.  These should keep you from filling a datastore and killing your VM’s or ESX Servers

One gotcha that you should watch out for is VM swap files, as these are usually stored with your virtual machines vmdk files in the VMFS datastore.  In VI3 the swap file was not deleted when a VM was powered down,  in vSphere the swap file is deleted on power down and recreated when the VM is powered up.  You should be aware of this when over provisioning storage as you could get into a situation whereby you find you can’t power on a VM because there isn’t enough space for the swap file to be created.  This becomes more likely as servers and VM configuration maximum’s increase,  if you have a VM with 20GB of RAM it’s going to need 20GB of disk space for the swap file.  if you have 256GB of RAM in your vSphere host and you allocate it all out to VM’s then you need to think about the 256GB of disk capacity required to service virtual machine swap files.

Storage vMotion

If you’ve already got a VI3 environment then the chances are that your VM’s aren’t thin provisioned,  how on earth are you going to take advantage of this new feature? Well if you have purchased a vSphere edition that supports storage vMotion then you can of course migrate the underlying storage and have it thin provisioned during the move.  This should allow existing VI3 customers to claim back a lot of space,  as I mentioned before I found that our development and test VI environments were only 48% utilised.  If I storage vmotion all those VM’s and thin provision at the same time I will free up about 1.5TB of storage that wasn’t being used in the first place.

I’ve included a video below which demonstrates the Storage vMotion and thin provisoning features in vSphere quite nicely, enjoy!

Gestalt-IT, Storage, VMware, vSphere Storage vMotion, Thin Provisioning, VSphere

This weekend I finally had the chance to catchup on some of the new storage features released as part of vSphere 4.0,  there are quite a few changes to cover,  some of them quite exciting.

VMFS Upgrade

Once of the good pieces of news to come out is that the VMFS changes in vSphere are minimal.  vSphere 4.0 introduces a minor point release (3.3.0 to 3.3.1) with some subtle changes,  so much so that it’s not really been documented anywhere.  Most of the changes with VMFS are actually delivered within the VMFS driver at the VMKernel level,  this is where most of the I/O improvements and features such as thin provisioning have been delivered as part of vSphere.

Upgrading VMFS was a major step in the upgrade from VMFS 2 to VMFS 3,  good to hear that there are no major drivers to upgrade VMFS as part of your vSphere upgrade.  Any new VMFS datastores created with the new vSphere hosts will of course be VMFS 3.3.1 however this is backwardly compatible with earlier versions of ESX 3.x.  If you really want to move onto the new version of VNFS, format some new datastores and use Storage vMotion to move your VM’s onto the new VMFS 3.3.1 datastores. 

Thin Provisioning

Thin provisioning is one of the areas that excites me most about the new vSphere release.  I conducted a very quick survey of my employers development and system test ESX environments recently and found that currently we were only utilising 48% of virtual storage that had been provisioned.  It’s easy to see where immediate savings can be made simply by implementing vSphere and thin provisioning.  I’ll be using that in the cost benefits case for sure!

Thin provisioning is nothing new,  it has been available at the array level for a while now, so one of the big questions is where should I thin provision?  Well that really depends what kind of environment you have I suppose.  Smaller customers will benefit greatly from VMware thin provisioning as they probably don’t own arrays capable of TP.  Bigger companies on the other hand might well benefit from carrying out both as they have both the skill sets and the equipment to full utilise it at both levels. 

Chad Sakac has written a superb article entitled “thin on thin where should you do thin provisioning vsphere 4.0 or array level” which goes deep into the new thin provisioning features and the discussions around what’s the best approach. I strongly suggest people give it a read,  it explains pretty much all you need to know.

Storage VMotion

The Storage vMotion in ESX 3.5 had a few limitations which vSphere addresses.  It’s now fully integrated with vCenter as opposed to being command line based in the previous version,  it allows for the moving of a VM between different storage types, i.e. FC, ISCSI or NFS.  One excellent usage of Storage vMotion is the ability to migrate your thick vm’s and change them to thin VM’s.  Perfect for reclaiming disk space and increasing utilisation without downtime, brilliant!
 
Storage vMotion has also been enhanced from an operational perspective. Previously storage vmotion involved taking a snapshot of a disk,  copying the parent disk to it’s new location and then taking the child snapshot and re-parenting the child disk with the parent.  This process required the 2 x the CPU and memory of the VM being migrated in order to ensure zero downtime.  In vSphere 4.0 Storage vMotion uses change block tracking and a process very similar to how vMotion deals with moving active memory between hosts.  The new Storage vMotion conducts an iterative process scanning what blocks have been changed, each iterative scan should result in smaller and smaller increments and when it gets down to a small enough size it conducts a very quick suspend / resume operation as opposed to using the doubling up resources method that it previously needed to.  Making it faster and more efficient than it was in it’s previous incarnation.

Para Virtualised SCSI

Para Virtualised SCSI (PVSCSI) is a new driver for I/O intensive virtual machines. VMware compare this to the vmxnet adapter,  which is an enhanced and optimised network driver providing higher performance.  PVSCSI is similar, it’s a specific driver that offers higher I/O throughput, lower latency and lower CPU utilisation within virtual machines. Figures discussed by Paul Manning on the recent Vmware community podcast included 92% increase in IOPS throughput and 40% decrease in latency when compared to the standard LSI / BUSLogic virtual driver.

A caveat of this technology is that the guest OS still has to boot from a non PVSCSI adapter (LSI / Buslogic),  you would look to add your PVSCSI adapter for your additional data virtual disks.  Currently only Windows 2003, Windows 2008 and RH Linux 5 have the software drivers to take adavantage of this new adapter.

Update  - Chad Sakac has posted a new EMCWorld I/O Performance comparison of the vSphere PVSCSI adpater vs the LSI SCSI adapter, check out the link for more details.

VMware Storage Book

Paul Manning mentioned on the recent podcast that VMware are planning a book dedicated to Virtualisation and storage in an attempt to consolidate the amount of documentation out there on Storage configuration and best practice.  Currently users need to look through 600 pages of the SAN Config guide and vendor guidelines. VMware would hope to try boil this down to a much more manageable 100 - 150 pages.

If you can’t wait that long, Chad Sakac has written the storage chapter in Scott Lowe’s new vSphere book which I believe is available for pre-order on Amazon

vSphere Storage WhitePaper

Paul Manning who I’ve mentioned in this blog post has written a great 10 page white paper explaining all of these features in more detail along with some of the more experimental features I haven’t mentioned. 

http://www.vmware.com/files/pdf/VMW_09Q1_WP_vSphereStorage_P10_R1.pdf

Gestalt-IT, New Products, Storage, VMware, vSphere esx, Storage, Storage vMotion, Thin Provisioning, VSphere

Was reading through my RSS feeds this morning while standing in line for a coffee (I love the iPhone) and came across Eric Sloof’s article on Compellent.

Compellent have introduced a powershell based command set to compliment their storage offering.  Now offering the ability to script a lot of the everyday CLI based tasks in a format that is becoming more and more popular.  For me the main benefit I can see is from an integration angle,  linking in windows and storage tasks together is the kind of thing that I can see becoming handy for BCP and DR scripting.

I had a small smile on my face when reading Eric’s article and I will tell you why,  I’ve recently been looking at Compellent for a solution I was building.  Compellent really impressed me with their offering, SAN simplified as far as I was concerned.  The fact that they started from scratch 4 years ago and heavily utilise software management, means that they’re not limited in the same way as some of the other legacy based vendors.  We didn’t end up choosing Compellent for the solution, however the choice was not based purely on the technical angle.  Compellent are still quite small in the UK but do seem to be making serious inroads into the market.  The awards they picked up this year are very impressive and I will be keeping an eye on their growth in the future.

The introduction of powershell to their offering I think shows what a good dynamic company they are. Be interested in any comments anyone has on working with Compellent or their solutions.

New Products, Storage, VI Toolkit / Powershell Compellent, SAN, Storage

Well I haven’t written anything in the last week or so as I appear to have been far to busy.  Luckily for me one of the reasons I was busy was down to the fact I was visiting Storage Expo in London.

I was there on official work business but as always I got the chance to indulge my unhealthy interest in all things virtual.  So what was the main theme doing the rounds at Storage Expo this year?  Well de-duplication appears to be the hottest topic of the moment.  Everyone is jumping on the band wagon and claiming to do it in some way or another,  I only heard about this technology about 9 months ago and now it seems to be spreading like wild fire.

I went to a talk by a technical architect from the Associated Press (Daily Mail, Evening Standard, etc) who had implemented a Data Domain DD580 appliance as a location to store his Vmware Snapshots / Backups.  He was getting a 20:1 and 25:1 de-duplication ratios and in some instances 60:1 ratio,  in fact it performed that well they were worried there was someting wrong with it when it didn’t fill up. They’ve since moved a number of backups off tape and on to this device quite successfully and over time the de-dup ratio climbs as there is more data on the device that’s duplicated.  How good is that,  you fill it with more data and the ratio goes up?!?!?  no wonder they’re valued at $1 Billion  It was summed up well at the end with a copy of an email from one of his storage team.

“to free up some space I deleted 22TB of old backups off a 5TB Data Domain storage device ??!?!?!”

A San administrator from CB Richard Ellis in the same talk had implemented a solution from FalconStor,  a company I had heard of but had not ever looked into.  He was getting 350:1 ratios on his file system backups,  unbelievable!! I couldn’t help thinking they must do a lot of contracts that have single word version changes or something because that is a crazy figure,  he certainly couldn’t explain why it was that high,  I wonder if FalconStor can.

I had a good chat with the guys at NetApp,  who interestingly enough are currently offering a guarantee (with some terms and conditions) that they can save you 50% on your storage usage for your virtual environment.  It’s all based on efficiency and some of it seems pretty sensible but neat at the same time,  however the disk setup the NetApp setup was being compared to in the presentation resembled a lesson in how not to setup your storage.  Won’t be to hard to gain 50% efficiency over something that wasn’t efficient in the first place.  However don’t get me wrong NetApp had some fantastic stuff going on in thin provisioning, SnapManager for Virtual Infrastructure and de-duplication,  I always have to stop and wonder though, how much is it all going to cost me???

I had a great chat with Sean from NetApp on the benefits of using NFS for Vmware,  now I’ve not had a lot of storage experience and it’s something I’m working on all the time to learn.  Sean took me through a whole load of stuff on the NetApp storage suite and how it complimented Vmware,  He used to do Vmware consultancy and it showed,  he knew his stuff and I have to say for 40 minutes we were scribbling on the whiteboard like mad, I learned a lot in that 40 minutes so thanks Sean.  Safe to say Im going to take a more indepth look at NFS for vmware and try learn a little more to see if it’s worth suggesting when we come to replace our VMware storage next.

Other highlights for me were meeting the guys from Compellent,  a company I’ve been following since VMworld 2007 and who seem to finally be getting a decent presence and excellent press in the UK. Their managing director Andy was buzzing,  so excitable and so energetic about the product,  it’s definately one I’ll be keeping a close eye on and was a worthy winner of a “best in show award” at VMworld 2008.

General, Storage